VALIDATION

We tested the same IndeBase control loop with ChatGPT and Claude.

The point of the tests was simple: can different AI systems operate through the same authority, execution, verification, and evidence layer without changing the underlying AI model?

ChatGPT completed the governed workflow and IndeBase verified the result.

Connected

ChatGPT was authenticated and bound to the intended IndeBase workspace.

Authority checked

The workspace authority was configured before the supported HubSpot action ran.

Result checked separately

IndeBase read HubSpot independently to confirm the intended state instead of trusting the AI's own success claim.

Cleanup controlled

The temporary activation record was removed through the governed path and the cleanup was independently confirmed.

The same control + verification model worked with a second frontier AI.

Connected to the same control layer

Claude authenticated to IndeBase and read the live workspace state.

Human approval actually stopped execution

A Claude-initiated HubSpot action stayed pending until a person approved it in IndeBase.

Execution happened only after approval

IndeBase performed the supported HubSpot write only after the approval requirement was satisfied.

IndeBase checked the result separately

A separate verification step checked HubSpot, recorded evidence, and returned a PASS verdict.

The capability boundary held

When asked to do an unsupported cleanup action, Claude did not invent another write path to get around the boundary.

IndeBase is not tied to one AI interface.

The tested evidence shows that ChatGPT and Claude can each operate through the same IndeBase authority, execution, evidence, and independent-verification architecture.

This is not a claim that IndeBase works with every AI system, every business system, or every action type. Current production validation is specific to the tested ChatGPT and Claude connections and the supported HubSpot workflow.